The one and only Namaste Technologies – Part 2 (with bonus Namaste financials datajam)

(This is part two of a three part series on Canadian marijuana e-retailer Namaste Technologies. Part 1, part 3.)

“Lifestyle marketing” is the invention of whatever real-life Don Draper figured out that people couldn’t care less about the many benefits offered by whichever product or service is paying to be advertised to them. Charts and graphs get information to sink in, but so what? Math is for squares. What people really want is the dopamine rush that comes with being able to imagine themselves as the person they deserve to be. Let ’em dream on that for a while, and they’ll buy anything in the real world that might make it come true.

 


Coffee Break Youtube channel, giving the people what they want.
 

In part one, we looked at how the people from Namaste were living their dream out loud in some kind of annoying dubstep track that’s only got one gear and never gets around to dropping the bass. The dream being sold there is the financial independence that comes with being in on the ground floor of the Amazon of pot, and who can’t get behind that?

All the finest, most personal dreams can be custom made out of the wealth dream, and that has everything to do with the company’s impressive retail investor following, many of whom are surely market neophytes who identify with CEO Sean Dollinger. This first-of-its-kind direct engagement strategy is effective because the lifestyle being showcased is that of self-styled, maverick third wave internet entrepreneurs. Nobody dreams on a stock market lifestyle, or at least nobody should. The stock market is terrible. This archetype is tolerating a brief encounter with it only for as long as it takes for their entrepreneurial genius to make them very rich through their ownership of the One True Stock.

Couldn’t fake this if you tried

Dial it up at 18:47, and witness Namaste CEO Sean Dollinger complaining about the “spoofing” of offers in the market for N.V.

 

I like the way he illustrates it using hand puppets.

While there are indeed IIROC rules against “spoofing” orders, Dollinger appears to be describing activity in an open market, and if that’s the case, he’s at very least got his terms wrong. Spoof orders are placed pre-market by traders trying to keep the bid in check. The offers can be called “fake” because they disappear when the market opens, and nobody has a chance to take them out. There is no way to make an offer during an open market that isn’t available to a buyer and, therefore, not “fake” by any definition.

Dollinger’s story has Namaste being manipulated by offers placed during an open market to scare off bids and drive the price down. That’s also dirty pool, of course, but I’m struck by the fact that he doesn’t mention trying to take the “fake” orders out.

Sean (I know he’s a reader), the next time you’re watching a big, scary wall line up on the ask side, consider setting an example by calling your broker instead of IIROC and the exchange. Cleaning out the offers, then going on youtube to put everyone on notice that you’ll do it again would be a baller move. Classic walking the walk. You’d have straight up taken stock from the jealous haters who are just using it as cheap ruse, trying to drag you and your shareholders down, and those sorry losers had it coming! It would come off a lot more confident than whining to and about IIROC and the TSX, but would also cost a lot more, and I don’t really know much about marketing. Maybe people identify better with whiners.

Don’t make me get my spreadsheet…

Let that video roll through 21:46 and Dollinger gets all righteous about it, telling his audience that Namaste “deserves” to be the leading company in the space.

“We deserve to be the leading company in the space. We do $30 million plus in revenue, next year we’ll do over $85 million. I can’t tell you how many companies presently do over $30 million, but I assure you, it’s not over five in the whole entire industry.”

-Namaste Technologies CEO Sean Dollinger on 420 Live, June 6th 2018

Dollinger has got one thing right: there are exactly five Canadian pot companies with more than $30 million in trailing twelve months revenue. But Namaste is not among them.

Namaste’s gross revenue in the most recent 4 quarters adds up to $17.5 million, which would have earned a top line profit of $3.5 million, and a net loss of $11.8 million.

(Author’s Note: We thought Dollinger might have been referring to the company’s last fiscal year, so we looked it up. He wasn’t, but BOY did that take a while! The original version of this post had an analysis of Namaste’s cashflow here, but various failed attempts at making their accounting add up from quarter to quarter made for enough content to fill a whole other blog post. At this time, we’ve sought comment from the company who may or may not get back to us before we publish The one and only Namaste Tech pt. 3, so stay tuned for that. (update! here it is.) For now, we’ll stick to their revenue, which is reported consistently in their statements, but doesn’t add up the way Dollinger adds it up on 420 Live.)

Namaste does not have $30 million in revenue in the trailing 12 month period. Namaste doesn’t have $30 million in revenue in any 12 month period. There has not been $30 million in revenue in the entire history of Namaste Technologies! $23,858,618 is every dime this company ever grossed and reported to date.

I thought for a second that Dollinger might have got to $30 million by forward projecting revenue based on his most recent quarter, but they did $5.6 million in Q ending Feb-18, and 4 of those would yield $22.4 million.

While he’s got the IIROC rule book out and is broadcasting to the world, Dollinger might want to see what it says about material misstatements by company executives. But don’t worry, Sean: I ain’t no snitch.

Printing money

But not for the company’s net.

You’d better believe there’s some stock being printed. Those 20 million shares in Dollinger’s SEDI filings didn’t all come out of the market.

Selected operating expenses & revenue, Nov, Feb and May quarters of last fiscal year.

I make no apologies for this strange chart, it’s a product of Namaste’s unique type of accounting.

The chart was drawn to illustrate the rate at which stock is being printed in this company in relation to other admin expenses, and their gross revenue. Stock-based compensation is Namaste’ single largest administrative expense in the middle two quarters of fiscal 2017. Fiscal Q4 (ending in August) is when they quit reporting the line items this way, so 3 quarters of these is all we get. I’m going to reserve comment on the Aug quarter until I can make sense of it.

The nature of companies’ stock options plans are that they are authorised to issue a certain amount of options to directors, officers and employees during the year. When those options are issued and at what price remains the discretion of management. The options are booked in the quarter that they vest, at the fair market value that they vest. Shareholders ought not have a problem with hard working management being paid in stock for growing the company, and professional operators of ventrue-stage companies never miss out on a chance to print themselves some paper.

Maybe this Namaste crew are stock market people after all.

The accounting change threw us a curve ball, but we can still chart the stock-based compensation vs. revenue for all quarters except the year end quarter, and here it is:

The entitled millennial cliche is a bit on the nose here, but it sure fits. This venture-stage e-retail company whose sales of actual marijuana are still a dream has come by their portion of this out-of-control pot market by securing actual revenue from sales, and showing a gross profit from those quarters. As we look at the revenue against the company’s quarterly share compensation, one has to wonder if Namaste’s management is operating as though they deserve a healthy chunk of equity in any quarter that they can show revenue and top line profit.

It’s an interesting study in modern management psychology. To test our thesis, we’ll first have to get a handle on Namaste’s operating profit. Stay tuned for part 3.

(feature image of Don Draper surely belongs to AMC, but comes via Ross Sarcano over at complex.com, one of those guys who invented love to sell you nylons.)

Disclaimer: ALWAYS DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH and consult with a licensed investment professional before making an investment. This communication should not be used as a basis for making any investment.

Leave a Reply

66 Comments on "The one and only Namaste Technologies – Part 2 (with bonus Namaste financials datajam)"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Josh
Guest

You guys mad they aren’t paying you for publicity? Wanting a piece of the pie for a lower price? Good luck with your attempt at a hit piece. Don’t forget to mention all the good things Namaste has done…. I’m sure that will be left out lol

stockie mcStockface
Guest

Lordie lawd…look at those consulting and compensation fees SKYROCKET! Looks like a circle jerk of check writing to ‘consultants and whatnots!’ Esp. considering how low their advert spending is when that should be at a heavy saturation point and I don’t see anything related to them in my lil’ town here in SoCal.

Or am I missing something here???

Anson
Guest
I thought this was an article on Namaste Technologies, but rather it seems like a hit piece on on Sean Dollinger. Clearly you guys have some beef and are trying to push a narrative to your audience. Sentencing your article with “Sean (I know he’s a reader)” clearly tells us the intent on why this article was even created, as well signs of an inferiority complex and delusions of grandeur. The data and numbers you’re showing isn’t wrong, but the conclusions you’re drawing either tells us you’re either VERY ignorant, or VERY disingenuous.You’re cherry-picking numbers and drawing conclusions that are… Read more »
Lukas Kane
Editor
Josh and Anson, the writer of the article states that, “Company Founders Sean Dollinger and Kory Zelickson aren’t afraid to tell anyone who will listen that they’ve got a better handle on marketing than anyone.” The numbers suggest that Namaste is better at marketing their stock to neophyte investors, than they are marketing weed to consumers. Warning signs? On May 15, 2018 the company issued a press release, “New Logo Symbolizes Namaste’s Evolution”. “The color palette was modified meticulously with a tight selection of turquoise, blue, and green tones to reflect the values of trust, transparency, tranquility, and wellness,” stated… Read more »
Anson
Guest
This is proving my point. Sean has gone on record in stating they are pushing back on press releases and are only going to issue an press release when they successfully follow through with a deal or reach a goal. Again, you guys are either being dishonest, in cherry-picking data and information to push a narrative or just ignorant. The latter is fine since you have a disclaimer to CYA which states you guys aren’t licensed professionals and might not have all the necessary information.(However, one would assume you have done a lot of research since this IS an multi-part… Read more »
Lukas Kane
Editor
Anson, thankyou for your measured response. I suppose, loosely speaking, “Cherry picking data and information” is exactly how you construct an article. ie. you have an opinion (Namaste is style-over-substance) and you cite data points to support that. Quoting verbatim a 40-day-old press release, or financial disclosures, would seem fair play. Conversely, if you just RANDOMLY stuck data points onto your article, it wouldn’t form into a cohesive shape. Anson, you have to admit, the CEO does sound like a used-car salesman. That is some truly weak sauce he’s pouring on You Tube. Best of luck with this and all… Read more »
Anson
Guest

When I say cherry picking information. Why didn’t the author add NamasteMD or Cannmart to his calculation 22.4 million by years end? Did he accidentally leave it out or have such bad research and analysis skills that he wasn’t able to find their biggest investments.

Braden Maccke
Guest

In calculating the company’s revenue, I used the consolidated financial statements of Namaste technologies, prepared and approved by the company for the respective periods. Itcs my understanding that Cannmart & NamasteMD are wholly owned subs whose revenue was consolidated into those statements & included in the figure.
If those companies were NOT Namaste subs, and their revenue was not included in the figure (not my understanding) then N shareholders would not own that revenue, and it would not count as Namaste gross sales by Sean’s definition or anyone else’s.

Anson
Guest
This is very poor and very harmful research and analysis. You projected the annual earnings of a company using data obtained 2 months ago without factoring in any of the present and future knowledge you obtained or any of the variables that affected it. A few variables you didn’t consider were 1)Their quarterly reported 1600 patients. Reason because they were still in beta phase and letting only a few people on to test stability and accuracy. Since “official” launch they gained 4400 new patients in 2 months.(no marketing done so far) They projected 5k patients by July ( reached 6k… Read more »
Chris Parry
Admin

Hey Anson, I’ll repeat – go eat a bag of dicks. If you have better information, go write your own report. Sitting here all day calling my people lazy because they’re not spending as much time bouncing on Namaste’s dick as you are is just a silly waste of everyone’s time.
We’ve called the future on Namaste several times and BEEN RIGHT EVERY TIME.
So long. Namaste. Good luck.

Anson
Guest
Chris Parry 1) ” they’re not spending as much time” You’re literally PAYING people to do research for a MULTI-ARTICLE write up and having opinions that are easily being corrected by a 5 second google search. 2)”We’ve called the future on Namaste several times and BEEN RIGHT EVERY TIME.” I seriously don’t see how you can be right about ANYTHING when during the course of our entire conversation I ANNIHILATED every single one of your arguments so hard, you DEFLECTED, resulted in NAME CALLING and plain STOPPED and GHOSTED my arguments. You call yourself and editor and journalist but you… Read more »
Chris Parry
Admin

Alright homer, we called Namaste as being severely overvalued and the weed stock mostly to lead the sector in collapsing in mid-December. It duly got crushed and has never recovered.
We’ve said since it wasn’t going up while you Dollinger nuthuggers claimed it was going to double any day now. It never has.
If you listened to me, you got out with your profits. anyone who has listened to you has been beaten and bled out.
So use AS MANY CAPS as you want, but you’re still wrong. History has proved it.

Anson
Guest

You have such strong opinions of a company and the first thing you name to boast about on being right is a basic TA on a company consolidation after a 10x increase in sp in 1 month? As well, it’s contingent on it may or may not stay low forever for the entirety of it’s life? Do you actually have anything to boast about or are you going to keep shouting ” the sky is blue” till the sun sets when you can’t anymore?

Cathy Martin
Guest

How can you publish such filth

Chris Parry
Admin

You mean the photos of the sexy nurses Namaste’s CEO paid for to sign people up for an illegal telemedicine medical consultation?
I know. It’s disgusting, isn’t it?

Arnold Hart
Guest

Sad that you are spending so much time bashing Sean and Namaste. Lots of negativity for no reason but to keep new shareholders away

Chris Parry
Admin

If that’s your take, you’re not reading so well.

Wood Sport
Guest
Braden Maccke … so I reread your article and the comments below and to sum it up I think the problem with your article, even if researched well, shows a clear subjective intent with little objectivity …. this hurts your credibility in what you are trying to say whether reality or fiction …. it might be better received for your own benefit. Is it at all possible you just do not understand? I think ultimately you are wrong about Namaste not being a success and more or less bashing what they are doing. It actually has already been a successful… Read more »
Chris Parry
Admin

You know they were doing $1m a quarter back when it was just a vape store with a $40m valuation, right?